Dismissed
Bunty v. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Company Limited
DRTSA/630/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 67
Case No.SA/630/2024
BUNTY Vs EDELWEISS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Date: 27.10.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Today, none appeared on behalf of the applicant despite passover, therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
BUNTY
EDELWEISS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court