On the application's own merits, the applicant requested to withdraw the Special Appeal without pursuing it. The Presiding Officer allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.
Special Appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 22
Case No.SA/618/2023
HARSHITA ARTS JEWELLERY AND ORS Vs IDFC BANK LIMITED
Date: 25.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Palash Srivastava, Counsel for the Applicant None for the Respondent
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as he
does not want to pursue this SA.
Request is allowed.
As the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Harshita Arts Jewellery and Ors
IDFC Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
