In a money recovery proceeding declared withdrawn by the applicant due to prior disposal of subject property, the Presiding Officer disposed of the appeal and pending interim applications with a direction to refund excess amounts.
Direction to refund excess amount within 7 days via RTGS; application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 24
Case No.SA/30/2025
ARVIND KUMAR PUNIYA Vs TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 25.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Yogesh Pujari, Counsel for the Applicant
ShriPramod Kumar, Counsel along with Authorized Representative for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the applicant submits that he is not pressing this SA as property has been sold.
He seeks to issue directions to the respondent FI to refund the excess amount within 7 days.
The account details be provided to the respondent FI to return the excess amount through RTGS in the said account.
With these directions, SA stands disposed of, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be directed to refund the excess sale proceeds?
Arvind Kumar Puniya
Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
