Suvhandra Seal v. Indian Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoveryTribunal-3,Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
case No. SA/60/ 2025SA/60/ 20252025 Suchandra Seal vs. Indian Bank
D!te ot Order Order wlth slgnature Sl9n.tur. ol
Order No.07 Prciant :
pt.11.09.2025
Sl.No. 18 For Appllcant ' i Ld. Counsel Ms, Sangeeta Roy
Ld. Counsel Mr. Chandra Prasad
Ld. Counsel Ms. M. lJlaity
For Defendant : Ld. Counsel l'ls. A. Das
Ld. Counsel Mr. ArPan Bose
IN3AO!2O25ls taken up for hearlng.
Hea.d Ld. counsels for both sides,
considered.
Ld Counsel for the Appllcant flled LA No 3801 of 2025
praylng for wlthdrawal of the main S A' The applicatlon is
supported by Amdavlt of the appllcant Mrs Suchandra seal
ouring ttre pendenqy of the s.A. the matter has been settled
wlth the Respondent Bank and the Respondent Bank is not
golng to contlnue wlth the lnstant proceeding Slnce this is an
amlcable settlement between the parties and the Applicant
intends to withdraw the maln S.A., no prejudice wlll be caused if
the I.A, is allowed' Accordingly, the lnstant l A is allowed and
stands disposed of being dismissed as withdrawn as settled
amlcably,
S.A, No. 60 of 2025 along wlth all other pendlng I'A's'
if any, ls dlsposed of as withdra!'vn.
File be consigned to Record Room after observing all
formalities.
( Kamal De )
Preslding Officer
DRT-3, Kolkata
case No. SA/60/ 2025SA/60/ 20252025
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Suchandra Seal
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
Kamal De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court