This is a default dismissal order in a Securitization Application. Due to lack of instructions from the applicant's counsel, the Presiding Officer dismissed the application for no prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 62
Case No. SA/550/2023
URMILA SHARMA Vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED Date: 23.01.2025. Present:
None for the Applicant Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI Ld. counsel for the applicant pleaded no instructions on behalf of the applicant, therefore, this Securitization Application dismissed in default for no prosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Urmi la Sharma
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
