The Presiding Officer of the DRT Jaipur disposed of an MA application as dismissed, noting lack of disclosure regarding the applicant's knowledge of proceedings and irregular service of notices in the Registration Case.
MA application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 27
Case No. MA/74/2024 IN OA/59/2022 SH GURLABH SINGH Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
Item No. 28
Case No. MA/108/2024 IN OA/995/2018 M/S GLOSSARIUM Vs INDIAN BANK
Item No. 29
Case No. MA/75/2024 IN OA/721/2023
SHIV PRATAP SAINI Vs RAJASTHAN MARUDHAR GRAMIN BANK
Date: 23.01.2025.
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Salim Khan, Manager Legal for the State Bank of India
In this matter, there is no limitation seeking review of the order. The MA applicant failed to disclose as to how he came to know about the proceedings pending before the Court.
Manager (Legal) appears for the bank and submits that notices have already been served in the RC only after that this MA has been filed. The addresses are same in OA/RC & MA
With these observations, This MA stands disposed of as dismissed.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the MA applicant established knowledge of proceedings
Whether service of notices in RC is sufficient
SH GURLABH SINGH
State Bank of India
M/S GLOSSARIUM
Indian Bank
SHIV PRATAP SAINI
Rajasthan Marudhar Gramin Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
