Single line order disposing a securitization application where the applicant did not file a reply and the respondent stated the account was regularized, leading to disposal of the petition.
The Securitization Application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 111
Case No. SA/533/2024
RAM CHANDRA PANCHARIYA Vs HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES
LTD
Date: 14.02.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Kapil Kumar Kumawat, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Avinash Kumbhaj, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI Counsel for the applicant submits that they have not received reply. Counsel for the respondent bank submits that since the account has become regularized, they are not proceeded under the Securitization.
In view of the above submissions, this Securitization Application stands disposed off.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Ramancharia Ram Chandra Panchariya
HDB Financial Services Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
