Neelkasnth Infra v. Icici Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Misc. Application stands dismissed on account of non-prosecution as the counsel for the applicant pleaded no instructions. No substantive order on merits is delivered.
The Misc. Application stands dismissed on account of non-prosecution as the counsel for the applicant pleaded no instructions. No substantive order on merits is delivered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 132
Case No. MA/291/2022 IN OA/237/2020
NEELKASNTH INFRA Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
Date: 13.02.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri K K Jain, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Manoj Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the applicant has pleaded no instructions on behalf of the applicant, therefore, this Misc. Application stands dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
NEELKASNTH INFRA
ICICI BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court