In SA No.518/2023 dated 19.09.2025, the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow dismissed theAppeal for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear on multiple dates.
The Special Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUN LUCKNOW
| Dateoforderor proceeding |
Orderwithsignatureofcourt | ;eaction thkbnwith atb |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SA No.518/2023 19.09.2025 SI No.55 |
None presentforthe s.Ap Sh. K.B. Singh Ldcou respondent bankpresent. Ld counsel for theresp submittedthatpropertyhas sold.It isfurther submitted appearing on behalf of ap severaldates Onperusalof ordershee that in this SA, none hasap several dates. It appears that not interestedinpursuing the In view of this, the s.A dismissed for the want of pros4 Interim order, ifany, vacated Let copies of this orderb thepartiesasperrules. Filebe consigned to reco Order beuploadedon t website. (Di (Pravas k Presidih (Manoj) |
blican$ dselfdI dndentl deend+ thatndl blicant R,it adl beared IAppli#i batterj . is a1 cutiod'l I is # &supdi hroodJ AeTri§l ctated) F the >ank ;tion eIS From lars From ntis !reby Freby Id to lnal’s un I) gO-ffic8r |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sh. K.B. Singh Ldcou
Respondent Bank
Manoj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
