S [o. 797 of 2024 & o. 798 of 2024 la it is submitted that in both thel SAs propel )presentatIon under section 13(3-A) was no+ nledj! howeve g letter dated 06.08.2024 was received on 07l08.20&1 requegti for revival of account, which was properjy ans' Fred by the respondent 13.08 124 in lieu of bank and delivered to the appjicant bI po„„,i,„ n,ti„ d,t,d 09.08.b024, lbolic ip+)ssessio] was t,k,n ,R„ m,ki.g ,t,t„t„y 1 ,,mail rlces respondent 'r whi sale notice bank has obtained valuation Feport dated 26.09.2024 was issued. I is st41 that notice dated 23.10.2024 in respect of bot§ the } hprietorship Firm. The subsequent sale notice wag also ;sued after statutory compliances made by the resbonde# Fbank. ] could not find any material on record, as to +hethe} Hhe sale taken place, any sale certificate was issued.I _ tB I find that any other point Has no+ Maised by the applicant, a: applicant, which h,„e be,„ d+sc„,s©lwhile dealing with SA No. 797/2024. view of above discussjons, not the SA. Hence, both the SA :024 798/2024 dismissed on contest being de,old of lner ld d }sed accordingly Accordingly, all the pendj Lspose File be consigned to the re4ord [Pra' Kum iding 'ebts )cbvery T] .ent signed, sealed, dated urlce le O $ 19th Day of September, 2025 [Pra+a! Kum„ i/gil esiding r bebts pvery T Lucknow (Malloi)
