This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 72
Case No. SA/49/2022
TIKAM CHAND KHETAN Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 26.05.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Kailash Tailor, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Ramnaresh Vijay, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the respondent bank submits that property has been auctioned and, but the same has not been challenged by the applicant, therefore, this SA become infractuous.
On the other hand, Counsel for the applicant has pleaded no instructions on behalf of the applicant, therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Tikam Chand Khetan
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
