Purushottam Kumar Luniya v. Mentor Home Loans India Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur dismissed the applicant's Securitization Application in default for lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 66
Case No. SA/123/2022
PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR LUNIYA Vs MENTOR HOME LOANS INDIA LTD
Date: 26.05.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Alok Mathur, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In the matter, name of advocate Sh. R C Sharma is wrongly appeared in the cause list. On 16.08.2024 Sh. Avinash Vashistha appeared on behalf of the applicant and undertook to file Vakalatnama thereafter, there is no representation. Therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Purushottam Kumar Luniya
Mentor Home Loans India Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court