In a second pass hearing, the Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant's application by default because no one appeared on behalf of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/466/2024 PREM NATH GUPTA Vs SMFG INDIA CREDIT COMPANY LIMITED 28.04.2025 Item No.6
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Karnesh Verma, Counsel for respondent FI (on VC).
This is second pass over since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Prem Nath Gupta
SMFG India Credit Company Limited
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
