Jaswinder Singh Gill v. Punjab National Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/454/2024 JASWINDER SINGH GILL Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
05.05.2025 Item No.37
Present: Mr. Satish Jaswla, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Vineet Sehgal, proxy Counsel for Mr. Ankit Kaushal, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Sehgal, counsel for respondent bank states that bank has withdrawn the notice under Section 13(2). In view of this, SA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jaswinder Singh Gill
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court