Baljit Singh v. Punjab National Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/411/2024 BALJIT SINGH Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
05.05.2025 Item No.7
Present: Mr. Amardeep Singh, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. DK Gupta and Ms. Seerat Sharma, Counsel for respondent No.2/PNB.
Counsel for the parties state that respondent bank has already taken the possession of the secured asset and also sold the property. Applicant was the alleged tenant in the property. Mr. Amardeep Singh, states that any formal order may be passed. In view of this, SA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Baljit Singh
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court