Disposed
Roshan Lal Yadav v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
DRTSA/443/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 55
Case No. SA/443/2023
ROSHAN LAL YADAV Vs EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION
COMPANY LIMITED
Date: 23.01.2025.
Present:
Shri Lalit Kishore Joshi, Proxy Counsel for the Applicant Ms. Neha Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the respondent bank submits that they have withdrew notice under Section 13(2) and the proceedings and fresh notice under Section 13(2) has already been issued. Applicant will be at liberty to challenge the fresh proceedings by filing fresh Securitization Application.
In view of the above, this Securitization Application stands disposed off.
Copy of the order be given Dasti to the concerned parties. File be consigned to record, as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ROSHAN LAL YADAV
EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court