Disposed
Anoop Kumar Gupta v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/390/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Security Application disposed as not pressed due to settlement between parties.
What did the court decide?
Security Application disposed as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwith date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.390/2022 19.1 1.2025 SL.No.49 |
Ld. Counsel for the applicantis present. Shri G. S.MishraLd. Counsel forthe respondent bank ispresent Ld. Counsel for theapplicantsubmits that the matter is settled between theparties and he is notpressing. Heard Ld. Counsels for boththe parties and perused therecord. In view of the fact, the present Securitization Application is disposed off as notpressed. Order be uploaded on theTribunal’s website (Dictated) D <br>(Pravas Kumar Singh) PresidingOfficer (Mugish) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court