The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of a secured application as infructuous after the respondent bank submitted that the account had been settled and closed. The file was consigned to the record room.
Application disposed as infructuous; file consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order with signature of court | Officeaction taken with date |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| S.A. No.387/2022 19.11.2025 SL.No.48 |
Shri Shatrughan Upadhayay Counselfortheapplicantispresent. Shri Kaushal Kishore Ld. Counse the respondent bank ispresent. Ld. Counsel for the respondent b submits that account has been settled closed. In view of the fact, the pre Securitization Application is disposed of infructuous. Let the file be consigned to re room. Order be uploaded on the Tribu website. (Dictated) (PravasKumar\S PresidingOffi (Mugish) |
Ld. lfor ank and sent f as cord nal’s ingh) cer |
Shatrughan Upadhayay
Respondent Bank
Pravas Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
