Special Appeal No. 383 of 2023 was disposed of as the SARFAESI proceedings were withdrawn by the Respondent No. 1 after the borrowers deposited the money, rendering the appeal infructuous according to the learned counsel for the Appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 04.07.2025 | Esh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.383 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Rajesh Dubey, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms Shobha Chavan i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocates for the Respondent No.1. None for other Respondents. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant |
|||
| nrb - 20 | submits that the borrowers have deposited the money with the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.1 has withdrawn the SARFAESI proceedings against the borrowers, so, this S.A. become infructuous and can be disposed of accordingly. In view of the submission made by the Ld. Advocate for the Applicant, S.A. No.383 of 2023 stands disposed of as infructuous. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Special Appeal No. 383 of 2023 should be disposed of as it became infructuous after the borrower deposited money leading to withdrawal of SARFAESI proceedings.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
