Disposed
Neeraj Kumar v. Indian Bank
DRTSA/274/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| SA 274 of 2022 | ||
| 03.07.2025 | Ld. counsels for the parties are present. It has been informed on behalf of the respondent by Shri S.S. Thakur, Advocate that the bank has decided not to take any SARFAESI Action anymore and the possession notice has been withdrawn by the bank after enquiry regarding the facts of this case. In such circumstances, the present SA has become Infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as infructuous. |
|
| Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. ~ Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Bank
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court