The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of a settlement application as infructuous because the account had been closed and the parties had settled the matter.
The Settlement Application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item no.49
Case No. SA/380/2023
SHAHEEN DINGANKAR Vs HINDUJA LEYLAND FINANCE LTD
Date: 21.02.2025
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Himanshu, Proxy Counsel for the applicant
Shri R K Gaur, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the Respondent submits that SA has become infractuous as the account has been closed and matter has been settled between the parties.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the Respondent that the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed off as infractuous.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SHAHEEN DINGANKAR
HINDUJA LEYLAND FINANCE LTD
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
