A Securitization Application was dismissed as infructuous because the account stood closed and the applicant did not appear to contest the submissions made by the respondent bank's officer.
Securitization Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item no.1
Case No. SA/318/2024
MR MOHANLAL SHARMA Vs AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 21.02.2025
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the applicant
Shri Kuldeep Kaviya, Legal Manager of the Respondent bank
Officer of the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed.
Considering the submissions made by officer of the respondent bank and also considering the fact that none appeared on behalf of the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Mr. Mohanlal Sharma
Adhar Housing Finance Limited
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
