The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Securitization Application filed by the applicant for default, noting that the applicant had not taken steps for long. No respondent appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A. No.288/2024 12.11.2025 SL.No.58 |
Shri Sarvesh Tiwari Ld. Counselfor the respondent-F.I.is present. None appearsfortheapplicant. I find that the applicant is nottaking steps sincelong. Accordingly, the presentSecuritization Application is dismissed for default. Let the file be consigned to record room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) <br>(Pravas Kumar J4h) PresidingOfficer (Mlugish) |
Applicant
Respondent-F.I.
Pravas Kumar Jh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
