Raj Iron Store v. Punjab and Sind Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/14/2025 RAJ IRON STORE Vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
03.07.2025 Item No.28
Present: Mr. Prajwal Jaiswal, proxy Counsel for Mr. Lekhraj Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant.
Mr. Dipinder Singh, Counsel for respondent No.1&2. Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, counsel for respondent No.4. None for respondent No.3.
File taken up today on the basis of application for preponement filed by the applicant. Counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to pursue the present SA and the same stands dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
RAJ IRON STORE
- respondent
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court