Dismissed
Bishojit Shreekant Maity and Anr. v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Corporation Ltd.
DRTSA/266/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 26.09.2025 | Esh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.266 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicants. Mr Alok Mishra and Mr Julee Modak, Advocates for Respondent. |
|||
| rst-14 | Ld. Advocate for Respondent Bank submits that No Dues Certificate has already been issued by Respondent Bank. No representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.266 of 2024 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Esh.
Respondent Bank
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court