The Applicant, absent, failed to appear to clarify non-prosecution. The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna, dismissed the application dated 21.11.2025 for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA
Date of order or proceeding
Order with the Signature of the Court
Office action taken with date
SA 266 of 2023
21.11.2025
Ld. counsel for the respondent is present.
None is present for the applicant.
It has been informed that on previous dates also, the applicant did not appear and the applicant was required to clarify why the case should not be dismissed. But as none has appeared for the applicant today also, it appears that the applicant has lost interest in this case and the present case is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Accordingly, it is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website.
Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer
Applicant
Respondent
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
