Single-line order in an appeal against a DRT locatable order found disposed due to applicant's non-appearance. Present counsel for the respondent stated appellant deposited a draft of Rs. 5.00 Lacs yet to be encashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/227/2025 M/S JASPAL SINGH AND SONS
Vs CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD
21.11.2025
Item No.19
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Rohit Sapra, Counsel for respondent FI along with Mr. Sumeet Arora, DGM of FI/in person.
Mr. Sapra, states that applicant has made the whole of the payment. Applicant has deposited a draft of Rs.5.00 Lacs with the FI which is yet to be encashed. Since, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant, SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
M/S Jaspal Singh and Sons
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
