The Debts Recovery Tribunal at Chandigarh dismissed the saint appeal as withdrawn by the applicant's counsel.
Statement at the Bar that the applicant would not pursue the present saint appeal is recorded to dismiss the same as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/264/2025 SARBJIT SINGH Vs CHOLAMANDLAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE 30.10.2025 Item No.8
Present: Mr. Gurudas, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Lovish, proxy Counsel for Mr. Rohit Sapra, Counsel for respondent FI. Counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to pursue the present SA and the same is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Sarbjit Singh
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
