Disposed
Mohammad Salman v. Hero Housing Finance Ltd.
DRTSA/237/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Dateoforderor proceeding |
Order with signature of court | Officeaction takenwith date |
|---|---|---|
| SA No. 237/24 12.1 1.2025 SINo.18 |
Sh. Rana Rahul Singh Ldcounselfor theapplicantispresent. Sh. Ritesh Goel Ld counsel forthe respondentFI ispresent. |
|
| Ld counsel for both the parties submittedthataccounthasbeensettled.It isfurthersubmittedthatsince theaccount has been settled, no cause of action surivives in this SA, therefore, SA maybe dismissed as infructuous. Since the account has been settled and closed no cause ofactionsurvivesin this S.A.,thereforethe SA is disposedof being infructuous. Accordingly, the S.A. is disposedof being infructuous. Recordbeconsigned torecord room. PendingI.A.ifany,alsodisposedoff. Order beuploadedon theTribunal’s website. (Dictated) [ (Pravas Ku&Singh) PresidingOfficer (Manoj) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
- respondent
Respondent FI
Coram
AI extract
Pravas K
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court