The application is disposed of in light of the applicant's affidavit-cum-undertaking to deposit remaining dues and hand over possession in case of default.
Stay of possession proceedings subject to deposit of dues as per undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 20.06.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.230 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Mr Sanjay Dubey, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Jay Pravin Khanvilkar, Applicant present in person. Mr Santosh Bhide (through VC) and Ms Preeti Tapdiya i/b M/s. Bhide & Asso., Advocates for Respondent Bank. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed affidavit-cum-undertaking (exhibit-10) stating that the Applicant has deposited Rs.50,000/- on 19.06.2025 and the Applicant undertakes to deposit Rs.2,30,000/- within seven working days from today to the Respondent Bank and further undertakes to deposit the EMIs as per the Sanction of the loan. In case of default, the Applicant will hand over the physical possession to the authorised officer of the Respondent Bank. Undertaking given by the Applicant is accepted. |
||
| In the light of affidavit-cum- undertaking (exhibit-10), Ld. Advocate for Respondent submits that Bank is not going to take possession of the property inquestion as scheduled todayi.e. |
Page 1 of 2
| 20.06.2025. | ||
|---|---|---|
| In the light of above, I.A. No.1426 of 2025 and S.A. No.230 of 2025 stands disposed of accordingly. |
||
| File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
||
| Sd/- P.O. |
Closed | |
| rst - 02 | DRT-II |
Page 2 of 2
Jay Pravin Khanvilkar
Respondent Bank
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
