Disposed
sikkim ferro alloys limited v. Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank)
DRTSA/222/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 25.06.2025 | Esh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.222 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Rajesh Dubey (through VC) and Mr Yash Naik, Advocates for the Applicant. None for the Respondents. |
|||
| rst - 28 | Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application (I.A. No.1323 of 2025) for withdrawal of the S.A. No.222 of 2022. Heard on I.A. No.1323 of 2025. During the course of arguments, Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the matter has been amicably settled with the Respondents and No Dues Letter dated 25.02.2025 has been issued and therefore, the Applicant seeks for withdrawal of the S.A. In view of the submissions made, I.A. No.1323 of 2025 is allowed and S.A. No.222 of 2022 stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court