The applicant failed to appear in the fourth hearing. The Debts Recovery Tribunal concluded the applicant was uninterested in pursuing the matter and dismissed the application in default.
Application dismissed in default due to the applicant's non-appearance and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/220/2024 SATWANT SINGH Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
01.08.2025 Item No.7
Present: None for the applicant. Mr. Vivek Verma, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is fourth pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Satwant Singh
State Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
