MA 327 of 2024 in the Patna Debt Recovery Tribunal was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant acknowledged that the underlying order had been set aside by the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| MA 327 of 2024 | ||
| 01.08.2025 | Ld. counsel for the respondent has informed that the order against which the present MA has been filed has already been set-aside by division bench of the Hon'ble High Court. So, the present MA has become Infructuous. Ld, counsel for the applicant submits that he has no information of this fact. As it has pointed out that the copy of the order of Hon'ble High Court has been filed as annexure "A" at page no.7 of the counter affidavit. In view of the above circumstances, the present MA is dismissed as Infructuous. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website.~r |
|
| Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
applicant
respondent
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
