Dismissed
Santosh Patil v. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd.
DRTSA/207/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 28.11.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.207 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Padmakar Garad (through VC), Advocate for the Respondent No.1. |
|||
| nrb - 35 | Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 07.10.2025 shows that no representation was made by the Applicant and also failed to take further steps in the matter. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.207 of 2023 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent No. 1
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court