Santosh Patil v. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd.
DRTSA/207/2023
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
¶3
27.04.2023 Sr. No.924
¶4
| SA(D) No.661 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr Santosh Patil Vs. Aspire Home Finance Corpn. & Ors. |
| Mr Mahesh Vishwakarmam, Mr Sajid I. Pates and Mr Sushant Maggu – Advocates for the applicant. Mr Padmakar Garad i/b M/s. S.C. Legal – Advocates for defendant no.1. None for other defendants. |
||
| 1. The applicant seeks adjournment to remove the office objections within one week and serve the papers upon the other parties within one week thereafter. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶5
Nidhi
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Santosh Patil
- respondent
Aspire Home Finance Corpn.
Coram
AI extract
Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court