the said documents, it is clear that alter classifying the loan account as NPA, theRespondent Bankissued demand notice dt.05.03.2021 u/s 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2OO2 arrd, sent the said notice to the Applicant through Regd. Post. As the said notice was retuned unserved, the Respondent published the said demand notice in The Hindu and Mana Telangana daily newspapers as evidenced by the copies of paper publication Iiled by the Respondent. Thus, there is valid service of demand notice on the Applicant. When the Applicant failed to comply with the said dcmand notice, tlie Respondcnt issued Possession notice dt. 18. 1 l.2O2l and the said notice was sent to the Applicant through Regd.postand admittedly, the Applicant received the said possession notice. The said possession notice was published in two daily newspapers asevidenced by the copies of paper publication filed by the Respondent and the said notice was also affixed on the schedule property as depicted in the photographs filed by the Respondent. Thus, the RespondentBank has scrupulously foliowed Rule 8(1)&(2) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2OO2 it't issuing possession notice to the Applicant. Even though, the Respondent Bank issued sale notices for conducting auction of the schedule property, sale was not materialized and so, the said sale notices become infructuous.
