The Respondent Bank fited their Reply denying all the adverse ailegations made in the sA and contended that the Applicant who is the borrower has not created any security interest in favour of the Respondent bank and the security interest in respect of the schedure property is created by Mr.K.Shankar Reddy, Ms.K.Mounika, K.Sntosh Redd, V.Rajamma and K.Brunda Shankar and so, the Applicant cannot be calied as an aggrieved party under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2oo2. The Applicant after availing loan from the Respondent, failed to repay the loan dues and so, the loan account was classified as NpA, Accordingly, the Respondent Bank issue d demand notice dt. 1 1. r r.2o2 r demanding the Applicant and others to repay the loan amount. The said notice addressed to the Applicant was returned unserved and so, the Respondent Bank affixed copy of the said notice at the address of the Applicant and pubiished the said notice in Mana Telangana and New Indian Express daily newspapers. Thereafter, the RespondentBank issued possession notice dt.1o.os.2o22 u/s 13(a) of the Act, 2oo2 and, the said notice was sent to the Applicant through Regd.post. The said possession notice was affixed on the schedule property and it was also
