M S Rays Enterprises v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-paragraph order by Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow dismissing a special appeal as infructuous after the account was settled and the cause of action extinguished.
What did the court decide?
Special appeal dismissed as infructuous; pending applications to be dismissed.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUN LUCKNOW
| Dateoforderor proceeding |
r | iceaction Inwith a |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SANo.19/2023 19.09.2025 SI No.62 |
o Ld counsel for the respon present. Ldcounselfor theresp submittedthat account has be isfurthersubmittedthatsince has been settled, no cau J surivives in this SA,therefore, dismissed asinfructuous Sincetheaccounthas andnocauseofactionsud S.A.,thereforetheSAisdispd infructuous Accordingly, the S.A.is being infructuous. Recordbeconsigned to r4 Pending I.A.ifany, also di Orderbeuploadedont website (DI (Pravas k Presidin (Manoj) |
bent bbFhkis 4ndendibank 4n setdldd.It ltheaB&ount e of lllction 1SA dAybe beenbbttled ives INthis sedodbeing Idispobbdof cord A sposdHI heTrib ctated)4 umari ,,,J gOfficer |
Coram
Manoj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court