Writ proceedings in banking recovery matter dismissed for non-prosecution as the respondent bank withdrew all notices during the pendency of the case.
Decision to dispense with the respondent's response and dismiss the special application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Page No.- | Order Sheet( continuation) | |
|---|---|---|
| Case NO.SA | /181/2023 MS SPEED DIGITAL PRINTERS AND ANR BANK |
Vs.UCO |
| Date of the order |
Order with signature | Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary |
| 21/11/202 5 |
Ld. Advocate Ms. Diya Mullick appears for the Applicant and pressing the withdrawal petition. In the above said application it was stated that the Applicant has filed an application being aggrieved by the action of the bank. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings Respondent Bank has withdrawn all the notices. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by the Applicant and his signature is identified by Advocate on record. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the SA Respondent if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant SA and any other pending IAs are dismissed for non-prosecution. |
|
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
MS Speed Digital Printers and Anr
UCO Bank
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
