On default, the Arbitral Tribunal dismissed the Section 34 application challenging an arbitration award, as the respondent bank withdrew earlier notices and the applicant was absent.
Application dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
| Order Sheet (continuation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No.SA/ | 108/2024 SRI KRISHNA DAIRY Vs CANARA BANK |
|
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
| 24/11/202 | None appears for Sarfaesi Applicant. | |
| 5 | Ld. Counsel Mr. Amit Gupta appears for Respondent Bank. | |
| Ld. Counsel for Respondent Bank submits that Bank has | ||
| withdrawn 13(2) and 13(4) notice and challenged the maintainability of this SA. As Respondent Bank has withdrawn 13(2) and 13(4) notice and Applicant is not present for hearing, this SA is dismissed for default. |
||
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
(Sne)
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
(Sne)
Sri Krishna Dairy
Canara Bank
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
