The Special Appeal S.A. No.167 of 2024 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the Applicant failed to appear on record on two consecutive dates without representation.
Special Appeal S.A. No.167 of 2024 was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 04.04.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.167 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Vinay Deshpande and Ms Shobha Chavan i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocates for Respondent. Order-sheet of the learned Registrar dated 21.01.2025 shows that no representation was made by the |
|||
| nrb - 30 | Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.167 of 2024 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Special Appeal S.A. No.167 of 2024 should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance by the Applicant.
Applicant
Respondent
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
