Disposed
Union Bank of India v. M/s Citichem India Limited
DRTOA/23/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Order allowed; O.A. No.23 of 2023 stands disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 03.04.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.23 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| rst - 22 | Ms Manisha Sonawane i/b M/s. Manish D. Tiwari & Asso., Advocate for the Applicant. Ms Barsha Parulekar, Advocate for Defendant. Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application (I.A. No.44 of 2023) for withdrawal of the O.A. No.23 of 2023. Pursuant to settlement arrived at with Defendants and having received Rs.50,27,509/- towards full and final settlement of the Claim under O.A., Applicant Bank moved an Interlocutory Application (I.A.) No.44 of 2023 seeking withdrawal of the O.A. Counsel for the Defendant does not object. I.A. No.44 of 2023 is allowed and O.A. No.23 of 2023 stands disposed of as withdrawn. This Tribunal orders refund of court fee as per Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant Bank
Defendants
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court