The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur dismissed, in default, the applicant's Apprehension (SA) after the applicant failed to appear despite prior notice. No substantive decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 14
Case No.SA/164/2024
KRISHNA GOPAL SHARMA Vs HNDUJA HOUSNG FNANCE LIMITED
Date: 25.07.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
None appeared on behalf of the applicant despite Passover.
Accordingly, SA stands dismissed in default. All pending IAs
stands disposed off if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
KRISHNA GOPAL SHARMA
HNDUJA HOUSNG FNANCE LIMITED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
