Mrs Aditi Akshay Tadfale v. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Special Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as Applicants failed to make representation and appeared on next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 27.02.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.161 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| nrb - 50 | On 05.12.2024, no representation was made by the Applicants. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicants either personally or through advocate. It appears from the conduct of the Applicants that they are not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.161 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicants
Respondent
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court