The Special Appeal S.A. No. 13 of 2024 was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear or make any representation on the hearing date, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
S.A. No. 13 of 2024 is dismissed and disposed of for want of response from the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 29.04.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.13 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. Case called out but there is no response from either of the parties. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 04.10.2024 shows that no representation was made by the |
|||
| nrb - 32 | Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.13 of 2024 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
