Single Judge Bench dismissed an SA on non-compliance with an order dated 24.10.2025, as the Applicant side failed to deposit the imposed cost or file proof thereof within time.
Costs imposed to condone delay must be deposited to avail of interim order; otherwise application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA1248t24 28t04/25 |
Appticant byShri Anmol Khandelwat,Proxy Advocate on behatfofShriAnuj Agrawat,Advocate Respondent byShriAdamyaBajpai,Advocate OnmatterbeingtakenCounselfortheRespondent inviting attentiononorderdated17104/75praysfor dismissaIofSA apprisingthatas informedbythe Respondent-BankAppticants havenotdepositedthe amount asperorderdated24102/25toenjoythe interimorder grantedbythis Tribunat. Onbeingqueried whethertheAppticantshave depositedthecostimposedtocondonethedetay, counselforAppticant wasnotinpositiontoreplythe query. Perusaloforder dated17104125itrevealsonlast dateofhearingatsothequerywas raised,however theCounselfortheApplicantpraysforadjournment toapprisetheBenchifthecostwasdepositedornot, eventhentheAppticant sideisnotinpositionto apprisethe fact. Sinceasperrecordno costdepositedordeposit receipthad beenfiledwith therecord, thisSAbeing dismissedfornon-comptianceoforderdated 24102/25withthisobservationthatiftheAppticant sideabtetodemonstratethatwithin timethecostas imposedbythisTribunalhasatready beendeposited thenmattersha[[betakenforfinalhearing. Patet) Presi gofficer ( |
Applicant
Respondent-Bank
gofficer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
