This debtor recovery tribunal order records that neither the applicant nor the respondent appeared despite summons. Consequently, the specific appeal under section 17(8)(a) of the SARFAESI Act and any pending intermediate applications were dismissed in the applicant's default.
Appeal dismissed in default; pending intermediate applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item no. 82
Case No. SA/124/2024
MEERA DEVI RAWAT Vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Date: 19.02.2025
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the applicant
None for the respondent
None appeared on behalf of the applicant as well as
Respondent FI despite Passover.
Accordingly, SA stands dismissed in default. All pending
IAs stands disposed off if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Meera Devi Rawat
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
