Allowed
Hdfc Bank v. Salig Distributor
DRTMA/45/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed an application for restoration of an original application dismissed for default, ordering fresh notice and listing the matter.
What did the court decide?
MA No.45/2023 allowed; OA No.71/2021 restored to original position; fresh notice directed; matter listed on 22.07.2026.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Date oforderor proceeding |
I Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| M.A. No.45/2023 08.10.2025 SL.No.71 |
BH of Ld.Counselfor theapplicantis present. BH of Ld.Counselfor therespondent ispresent. Ld.Counselfortheapplicantismoving MA No.45 of2023forrestorationof the OA No.71 of 2021. It issubmittedwhennone appeared on repeated call the casewas dismissed fordefault It isfurthersubmittedthat this MA has been brought on 21.03.2023 mainly ontwo grounds. It was submitted that in intervening period there was a general extensionof limitationby theHon’bleApex Court inthe suomotocase andfurtherthat afterthedate ofknowledgetheapplicationhas beenfiled withintime. Ld. Counsel for therespondent submits that the MA has been filed with a delya. Ld.Counselfortheapplicanthasalso submittedthat the OA No.71 of 2021has beenbroughtbytheapplicant forrecovery of public money and if it is not restored toits original position;theapplicantbankshallbe puttoaloss. Inviewof the fact, the MA isallowed and disposed off and the OA No.71 of2021 is restored to its original position. The applicant is directed to take steps forfreshnoticeupon the respondents. Let O.A. No.71 of 2021 belistedon 22.07.2026 before the Court Order beuploadedon theTribunal’s website. (Dictated) \J (Pravas KumaBingh) PresidingOfficer (Mugish) |
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumbh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court