Suitable application stands dismissed for non-appearance and withdrawal by the applicant, who failed to present any representation before the bench on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 30.10.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.113 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Ms Sneha Nandgoankar (through VC), Advocate for the Respondent. Order-sheet dated 17.10.2025 shows that no representation was made by the |
|||
| nrb - 25 | Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.113 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
