Inder Kumar v. Au Small Finance Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
An application was disposed of summarily as it was admitted by the applicant's counsel to be no longer pressed, without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 111
Case No. RA/26/2023 IN SA/360/2023
INDER KUMAR Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 20.01.2025.
Present:
Shri Piyush Khandelwal, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Himanshu Saini, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the applicant submits that he seeks no instructions from the applicant.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the applicant, this SA stands disposed of as not pressed.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
INDER KUMAR
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court